Life cycle costs could encourage military to replace F-35 with Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program

Fixing the F-35 requires the Air Force, software development teams, and Lockheed Martin to run the same direction and at the same pace.
Feb. 1, 2021
2 min read

WASHINGTON – The exorbitant life-cycle costs of the F-35 jet fighter means the Air Force cannot afford to buy as many aircraft as it needs, which makes the Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program all the more important, says outgoing Air Force acquisition czar Will Roper. Breaking Defense reports. Continue reading original article

The Military & Aerospace Electronics take:

1 Feb. 2021 -- “I think the F-35 program is a long way from being at a sustainment point that we need. I think it’s a long way from being an affordable fighter that we can buy in bulk,” Roper said shortly before leaving office.

“That’s the reason why Next-Generation Air Dominance is so important to the Air Force,” he said. “It doesn’t just represent a next-generation fighter with bells and whistles that we will need in warfighting. It doesn’t just represent a completely different acquisition paradigm. It also represents a chance to design an airplane that is more sustainable than the F-35 if, in fact, the F-35 cannot get its cost-per-flying-hour down.”

He seemed to suggest that, all things considered, perhaps the answer is to turn to NGAD to build a wartime-fit fighter fleet more rapidly.

Related: Boeing to install BAE Systems EPAWSS electronic warfare avionics aboard Air Force F-15 jet fighter fleet

Related: Lockheed Martin gets $7.2 billion order for 90 F-35 fighter-bomber jet aircraft

Related: Boeing moves into production on electronic warfare (EW) avionics for Air Force F-15 jet fighter fleet

John Keller, chief editor
Military & Aerospace Electronics

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Military Aerospace, create an account today!